Justin Wolfers

Professor of Economics and Public Policy


Subjective Well-Being

Subjective Well-Being and Income: Is There Any Evidence of Satiation?

with Betsey Stevenson

American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 101(3) 598-604, May 2013

Many scholars have argued that once basic needs have been met, higher income is no longer associated with higher in subjective well-being. We assess the validity of this claim in comparisons of both rich and poor countries, and also of rich and poor people within a country. Analyzing multiple datasets, multiple definitions of "basic needs" and multiple questions about well-being, we find no support for this claim. The relationship between well-being and income is roughly linear-log and does not diminish as incomes rise. If there is a satiation point, we are yet to reach it.

Longer working paper version, which has more detail.

Infographic summarizing the paper (pdf)

Download datasets and code

Supplementary information on AER webpage

The New Stylized Facts About Income and Subjective Well-Being

with Daniel Sacks and Betsey Stevenson

Emotion, 12(6) 1181-1187, December 2012.

Economists in recent decades have turned their attention to data that asks people how happy or satisfied they are with their lives. Much of the early research concluded that the role of income in determining well-being was limited, and that only income relative to others was related to well-being. In this paper, we review the evidence to assess the importance of absolute and relative income in determining well-being. Our research suggests that absolute income plays a major role in determining well-being and that national comparisons offer little evidence to support theories of relative income. We find that well-being rises with income, whether we compare people in a single country and year, whether we look across countries, or whether we look at economic growth for a given country. Through these comparisons we show that richer people report higher well-being than poorer people; that people in richer countries, on average, experience greater well-being than people in poorer countries; and that economic growth and growth in well-being are clearly related. Moreover, the data show no evidence for a satiation point above which income and well-being are no longer related.

Subjective and Objective Indicators of Racial Progress

with Betsey Stevenson

Journal of Legal Studies, 41(2) 459-493, June 2012

Subjective well-being data reveal that blacks are less happy than are whites. However, much of this racial gap in happiness has closed over the past 35 years. We investigate measures of subjective well-being that indicate that the well-being of blacks has increased both absolutely and relative to whites. These changes in well-being are found across various datasets and measures of subjective well-being. However the gains in happiness are concentrated among women and those living in the south. While the opportunities and achievements of blacks have improved over this period, the happiness gains far exceed that which can be attributed to these objective improvements.

Subjective Well-Being, Income, Economic Development and Growth

Development Challenges in a Post-Crisis World, World Bank ABCDE Conference Volume, 2010

with Daniel W. Sacks and Betsey Stevenson

We explore the relationships between subjective well-being and income, as seen across individuals within a given country, between countries in a given year, and as a country grows through time. We show that richer individuals in a given country are more satisfied with their lives than are poorer individuals, and establish that this relationship is similar in most countries around the world. Turning to the relationship between countries, we show that average life satisfaction is higher in countries with greater GDP per capita. The magnitude of the satisfaction-income gradient is roughly the same whether we compare individuals or countries, suggesting that absolute income plays an important role in influencing well-being. Finally, studying changes in satisfaction over time, we find that as countries experience economic growth, their citizens' life satisfaction typically grows, and that those countries experiencing more rapid economic growth also tend to experience more rapid growth in life satisfaction. These results together suggest that measured subjective well-being grows hand in hand with material living standards.

Video of my conference presentation

The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness

with Betsey Stevenson

American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, August 2009

By most objective measures the lives of women in the United States have improved over the past 35 years, yet we show that measures of subjective well-being indicate that women's happiness has declined both absolutely and relative to male happiness. The paradox of women's declining relative well-being is found examining multiple countries, datasets, and measures of subjective well-being, and is pervasive across demographic groups. Relative declines in female happiness have eroded a gender gap in happiness in which women in the 1970s typically reported higher subjective well-being than did men. These declines have continued and a new gender gap is emerging—one with higher subjective well-being for men. Our findings raise provocative questions about the contribution of the women's movement to women's welfare and about the legitimacy of using subjective well-being to assess broad social changes.

Data appendix and Stata programs

Happiness Inequality in the United States

with Betsey Stevenson

Journal of Legal Studies, 37(S2), June 2008

This paper examines how the level and dispersion of self-reported happiness has evolved over the period 1972-2006. While there has been no increase in aggregate happiness, inequality in happiness has fallen substantially since the 1970s. There have been large changes in the level of happiness across groups: Two-thirds of the black-white happiness gap has been eroded, and the gender happiness gap has disappeared entirely. Paralleling changes in the income distribution, differences in happiness by education have widened substantially. We develop an integrated approach to measuring inequality and decomposing changes in the distribution of happiness, finding a pervasive decline in within-group inequality during the 1970s and 1980s that was experienced by even narrowly-defined demographic groups. Around one-third of this decline has subsequently been unwound. Juxtaposing these changes with large rises in income inequality suggests an important role for non-pecuniary factors in shaping the well-being distribution.

Download dataset and programs

My digestible summary (in three parts): 1, 2, 3

Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox

with Betsey Stevenson

Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Spring 2008.

The "Easterlin paradox" suggests that there is no link between a society's economic development and its average level of happiness. We re-assess this paradox analyzing multiple rich datasets spanning many decades. Using recent data on a broader array of countries, we establish a clear positive link between average levels of subjective well-being and GDP per capita across countries, and find no evidence of a satiation point beyond which wealthier countries have no further increases in subjective well-being. We show that the estimated relationship is consistent across many datasets and is similar to the relationship between subject well-being and income observed within countries. Finally, examining the relationship between changes in subjective well-being and income over time within countries we find economic growth associated with rising happiness. Together these findings indicate a clear role for absolute income and a more limited role for relative income comparisons in determining happiness.

Download datasets and code

A digestible summary (six parts): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.

A presentation at the Aspen Ideas Festival

Is Business Cycle Volatility Costly? Evidence From Surveys of Subjective Wellbeing

Published, International Finance, 6(1), 2003. (Lead article)

And in Council on Foreign Relations Conference volume, "Stabilizing the Economy".

This paper analyzes the effects of business cycle volatility on measures of subjective wellbeing, including self-reported happiness and life satisfaction. I find robust evidence that inflation, and particularly unemployment, lower perceived wellbeing. Conditional on levels of unemployment and inflation, greater macroeconomic volatility undermines wellbeing. These effects are moderate but important: eliminating unemployment volatility would raise wellbeing by an amount roughly equal to that from lowering unemployment by a quarter of a percentage point. The effects of inflation volatility on wellbeing are less easy to detect and are likely smaller.

Discussion by Lars Svensson


Trust in Public Institutions over the Business Cycle

with Betsey Stevenson

American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 101(3) 281-287, May 2011

We document that trust in public institutions and particularly trust in banks, business and government has declined over recent years. U.S. time series evidence suggests that this partly reflects the pro-cyclical nature of trust in institutions. Cross-country comparisons reveal a clear legacy of the Great Recession, and those countries whose unemployment grew the most suffered the biggest loss in confidence in institutions, particularly in trust in government and the financial sector. Finally, analysis of several repeated cross-sections of confidence within U.S. states yields similar qualitative patterns, but much smaller magnitudes in response to state-specific shocks.

Download data and Stata programs

Aggregate Shocks or Aggregate Information? Costly Information and Business Cycle Comovement

with Laura Veldkamp

Journal of Monetary Economics, 54: 37-55, September 2007.

When similar patterns of expansion and contraction are observed across sectors, we call this a business cycle. Yet explaining the similarity and synchronization of these cycles across industries remains a puzzle. Whereas output growth across industries is highly correlated, identifiable shocks, like shocks to productivity, are far less correlated. While previous work has examined complementarities in production, we propose that sectors make similar input decisions because of complementarities in information acquisition. Because information about driving forces has a high fixed cost of production and a low marginal cost of replication, it can be more efficient for firms to share the cost of discovering common shocks than to invest in uncovering detailed sectoral information. Firms basing their decisions on this common information make highly correlated production choices. This mechanism amplifies the effects of common shocks, relative to sectoral shocks.

Download appendix

Macroeconomic Derivatives: An Initial Analysis of Market-Based Macro Forecasts, Uncertainty and Risk

with Refet Gurkaynak

NBER International Seminar on Macroeconomics, 2005.

In September 2002, a new market in "Economic Derivatives" was launched allowing traders to take positions on future values of several macroeconomic data releases. We provide an initial analysis of the prices of these options. We find that market-based measures of expectations are similar to survey-based forecasts although the market-based measures are somewhat more accurate better predict financial market responses to surprises in data. These markets also provide implied probabilities of the full range of specific outcomes, allowing us to measure uncertainty, assess its driving forces, and comparing this measure of uncertainty with the dispersion of point-estimates among individual forecasters (a measure of disagreement). We also assess the accuracy of market-generated probability density forecasts. A consistent theme is that few of the behavioral anomalies present in surveys of professional forecasts survive in equilibrium, and these markets are remarkably well calibrated. Finally we assess the role of risk, finding little evidence that risk-aversion drives a wedge between market prices and probabilities in this market.

Download dataset and data appendix

A digestible summary, published as a San Francisco Economic Letter

Published discussions by Chris Carroll and Adam Szeidl

Disagreement About Inflation Expectations

with Greg Mankiw and Ricardo Reis

NBER Macroeconomics Annual (2003).

Analyzing 50 years of inflation expectations data from several sources, we document substantial disagreement among both consumers and professional economists about expected future inflation. Moreover, this disagreement shows substantial variation through time, moving with inflation, the absolute value of the change in inflation, and relative price variability. We argue that a satisfactory model of economic dynamics must speak to these important business cycle moments. Noting that most macroeconomic models do not endogenously generate disagreement, we show that a simple “sticky-information” model broadly matches many of these facts. Moreover, the sticky-information model is consistent with other observed departures of inflation expectations from full rationality, including autocorrelated forecast errors and insufficient sensitivity to recent macroeconomic news.

Download dataset and code

Family Economics

Trends in Marital Stability

with Betsey Stevenson

Research Handbook in the Law and Economics of the Family, Edward Elgar Press, 2011.

Recent reports about the stability of marriages appear to yield conflicting conclusions. We reconcile these estimates, showing that data from several sources uniformly point to increasing marital stability among those married since the mid-late 1970s.

Marriage and Divorce: Changes and their Driving Forces

with Betsey Stevenson

Published, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2) 27-52, Spring 2007.

Previously: NBER Working Paper #12994

We document marriage and divorce behavior, comparing trends through the past 150 years and outcomes across demographic groups and countries. While divorce rates have risen over the past 150 years, they have been falling for the past quarter century. Marriage rates have also been falling, but more strikingly, the importance of marriage at different points in the life cycle has changed, reflecting rising age at first marriage, rising divorce followed by high remarriage rates, and a combination of increased longevity with a declining age gap between husbasnds and wives. Cohabitation has also become increasingly important, emerging as a widely used step on the path to marriage. Out-of-wedlock fertility has also risen, consistent with declining "shotgun marriages". Compared with other countries, marriage maintains a central role in American life. We then turn to documenting some of the driving forces causing these changes in the marriage market: the rise of the pill and women's control over their own fertility; sharp changes in wage structure, including a rise in inequality and partial closing of the gender wage gap; dramatic changes in home production technologies; and the emergence of the internet as a new matching technology. Finally, we discuss how these facts should inform family policy debates.

Did Unilateral Divorce Raise Divorce Rates? A Reconciliation and New Results

Published, American Economic Review, 96(5), December 2006, 1802-1820.

Previously: NBER Working Paper #10014 (contains model)

Becker has argued that the rise in divorce rates over the last thirty years does not reflect liberalized divorce laws. His argument rests on a basic application of the Coase theorem to marital bargaining. Each iteration of the ensuing empirical literature has come to a different conclusions. This paper reconciles these various estimates, showing that differences reflect a failure to carefully consider both the political endogeneity of these decisions, and the dynamic response of divorce rates to a regime change. New estimates suggest that unilateral divorce laws led to a large increase in divorce rates that lasted about a decade, followed by a significant reversal.

Data appendix, dataset and Stata programs.

Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: Divorce Laws and Family Distress

with Betsey Stevenson

Quarterly Journal of Economics 121(1), February 2006

(Previously circulated under the title "Til Death Do Us Part: The Effects of Divorce Laws on Suicide, Domestic Violence and Intimate Homicide")

Over the past thirty years changes in divorce law have significantly increased access to divorce. The different timing of divorce law reform across states provides a useful quasi-experiment with which to examine the effects of this change. We analyze state panel data to estimate changes in suicide, domestic violence and spousal murder rates arising from the change in divorce law. Suicide rates are used as a quantifiable measure of happiness and well-being, albeit one that focuses on the extreme lower tail of the distribution. We find a large, statistically significant, and econometrically robust decline in the number of women committing suicide following the introduction of unilateral divorce. No significant effect is found for men. Domestic violence is analyzed using both data on family conflict resolution, and intimate homicide rates. The results indicate a large decline in domestic violence for both men and women in states that adopted unilateral divorce. We find suggestive evidence that unilateral divorce led to a decline in females murdered by their partners, while the data revealed no discernible effects for men murdered. In sum, we find strong evidence that legal institutions have profound real effects on outcomes within families.

Link to Data appendix, dataset and Stata programs.

Labor Markets

The Role of Shocks and Institutions in the Rise of European Unemployment: The Aggregate Evidence

with Olivier Blanchard

Published, Economic Journal, March 2000

Two key facts about European unemployment must be explained: the rise in unemployment since the 1960s, and the heterogeneity of individual country experiences. While adverse shocks can potentially explain much of the rise in unemployment, there is insufficient heterogeneity in these shocks to explain cross-country differences. Alternatively, while explanations focusing on labor market institutions explain cross-country differences well, many of these institutions pre-date the rise in unemployment. Based on a panel of institutions and shocks for 20 OECD nations since 1960, we find that the interaction between shocks and institutions is crucial to explaining both stylized facts. Our first specification assumes that there are common, but unobservable, shocks across countries; we find that these shocks have a larger and more persistent effect in countries with poor labor market institutions. Our second specification constructs series for the macro shocks, and again finds evidence that the same size shock has differential effects on unemployment when labor market institutions differ. These findings suggest that institutions determine the relevance of the unemployed to wage-setting, thereby determining the evolution of equilibrium unemployment rates following a shock.

Download data appendix, dataset and Stata programs

Employment Protection and Job Flows: Evidence from Seasonal Cycles

Accepted subject to minor revision, Economic Inquiry

Theory implies that employment protection will unambiguously decrease job flows. However, cross-country comparisons of annual rates of job reallocation seem to show that employment protection has no discernible effect on job flows. This paper presents a model that shows that employment protection does not significantly alter a firm’s response to highly persistent shocks such as those present in annual data. By contrast, quarterly job flows will reflect highly transitory shocks such as those associated with the seasonal cycle. It is here that employment protection should reduce job flows. Testing this hypothesis requires a consistent set of cross-country set of quarterly job flows. In the absence of such data, this paper takes a novel approach, manipulating available household survey data. Specifically, a measure of job flows caused by the seasonal cycle is constructed. Analyzing these flows across 14 OECD countries, employment protection is shown to have significant and economically meaningful effects on job flows. Indeed, the size of the effect is sufficient to confirm Blanchard and Portugal’s hypothesis that it is employment protection that explains the different pattern of labor turnover between Portugal and the USA.

Political Economy

Forecasting Elections: Voter Intentions versus Expectations

with David Rothschild

Most pollsters base their election projections off questions of voter intentions, which ask "If the election were held today, who would you vote for?" By contrast, we probe the value of questions probing voters' expectations, which typically ask: "Regardless of who you plan to vote for, who do you think will win the upcoming election?" We demonstrate that polls of voter expectations consistently yield more accurate forecasts than polls of voter intentions. A small-scale structural model reveals that this is because we are polling from a broader information set, and voters respond as if they had polled twenty of their friends. This model also provides a rational interpretation for why respondents' forecasts are correlated with their expectations. We also show that we can use expectations polls to extract accurate election forecasts even from extremely skewed samples.

Party Influence in Congress and the Economy

with Erik Snowberg and Eric Zitzewitz

Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2(3) 277-286, August 2007.

To understand the extent to which partisan majorities in Congress influence economic policy, we compare financial market responses in recent midterm elections to Presidential elections. We use prediction markets tracking election outcomes as a means of precisely timing and calibrating the arrival of news, allowing substantially more precise estimates than a traditional event study methodology. We find that equity values, oil prices, and Treasury yields are slightly higher with Republican majorities in Congress, and that a switch in the majority party in a chamber of Congress has an impact that is only 10-30 percent of that of the Presidency. We also find evidence inconsistent with the popular view that divided government is better for equities, finding instead that equity valuations increase monotonically, albeit slightly, with the degree of Republican control.

Download dataset, code and data appendix

Partisan Impacts on the Economy: Evidence from Prediction Markets and Close Elections

with Erik Snowberg and Eric Zitzewitz

Quarterly Journal of Economics, May 2007, 122(2) 807-829.

Political economists interested in discerning the effects of election outcomes on the economy have been hampered by the problem that economic outcomes also influence elections. We sidestep these problems by analyzing movements in economic indicators caused by clearly exogenous changes in expectations about the likely winner during election day. Analyzing high frequency financial fluctuations on November 2 and 3 in 2004, we find that markets anticipated higher equity prices, interest rates and oil prices and a stronger dollar under a Bush presidency than under Kerry. A similar Republican-Democrat differential was also observed for the 2000 Bush-Gore contest. Prediction market based analyses of all Presidential elections since 1880 also reveal a similar pattern of partisan impacts, suggesting that electing a Republican President raises equity valuations by 2‑3 percent, and that since Reagan, Republican Presidents have tended to raise bond yields.

Download dataset and data appendix

Using Markets to Inform Policy: The Case of the Iraq War

with Eric Zitzewitz

Economica, 76(302): 225-250; April 2009.

Market prices incorporate large amounts of information, and our aim in this paper is to demonstrate that prediction markets can help extract this information, prospectively allowing this aggregated expertise to inform policy decisions in real-time. We provide a case study, exploiting data from a market trading in contracts which paid off if Saddam Hussein was removed as leader of Iraq, to learn about financial market participants’ expectations of the consequences of the 2003 Iraq war. We conducted an ex-ante analysis, which we disseminated before the war, finding that a 10 percent increase in the probability of war was accompanied by a $1 increase in spot oil prices that futures markets suggested was expected to dissipate quickly. Equity prices movements implied that the same shock led to a 1½ percent decline in the S&P 500. Further, the existence of widely-traded options allows us to back out the entire distribution of market expectations of the war’s near-term effects, finding that these large effects reflected a negatively skewed distribution, with a substantial probability of an extremely adverse outcome. The flow of war-related news through our sample explains a large proportion of daily oil and equity price movements. Subsequent analysis suggests that these relationships continued to hold out-of-sample. Our analysis also allows us to characterize which industries and countries were most sensitive to war news, and when the war turned out somewhat better than ex-ante expectations, these sectors recovered, confirming these cross-sectional implications. We highlight the particular features of this case study that make it particularly amenable to this style of policy analysis, and discuss some of the issues in applying this method to other policy contexts.

This paper incorporates much of the material in the following paper, which was produced prior to the war in Iraq:

  • What Do Financial Markets Think of War in Iraq? with Andrew Leigh and Eric Zitzewitz, NBER Working Paper 9587
  • Are Voters Rational? Evidence from Gubernatorial Elections

    Revise and resubmit, Review of Economics and Statistics

    Winner, Milken Institute Award for Distinguished Economic Research

    Are voters rational? Standard agency theory suggests that rational voters will seek to re-elect politicians who deliver favorable outcomes. A second implication is that it makes little sense to re-elect politicians following good outcomes that are not a reflection of their competence. Indeed, rational voters will filter such exogenous shocks from their assessments in order to avoid electing incompetent, but lucky, politicians. This paper measures the extent to which voters in state gubernatorial elections irrationally attribute credit to the state governor for economic fluctuations unrelated to their actions. Simple tests of relative performance evaluation reveal that voters evaluate their state’s economic performance relative to the national economy. However, this is only evidence of rule-of-thumb performance filtering. More sophisticated tests reveal that voters in pro-cyclical states are consistently fooled into re-electing incumbents during national booms, only to dump them during national recessions. Similarly, voters in oil-producing states tend to re-elect incumbent governors during oil price rises, and vote them out of office when the oil price drops. Consonant with an emerging behavioral literature, this suggests that voters make systematic attribution errors and are best characterized as quasi-rational.

    Death Penalty

    Estimating the Impact of the Death Penalty on Murder

    with John J. Donohue

    American Law and Economics Review (2009) 11(2):249-309.

    This paper reviews the econometric issues in efforts to estimate the impact of the death penalty on murder, focusing on six recent studies published since 2003. We highlight the large number of choices that must be made when specifying the various panel data models that have been used to address this question. There is little clarity about the knowledge potential murderers have concerning the risk of execution: are they influenced by the passage of a death penalty statute, the number of executions in a state, the proportion of murders in a state that leads to an execution, and details about the limited types of murders that are potentially susceptible to a sentence of death? If an execution rate is a viable proxy, should it be calculated using the ratio of last year’s executions to last year’s murders, last year’s executions to the murders a number of years earlier, or some other values? We illustrate how sensitive various estimates are to these choices. Importantly, the most up-to-date OLS panel data studies generate no evidence of a deterrent effect, while three 2SLS studies purport to find such evidence. The 2SLS studies, none of which shows results that are robust to clustering their standard errors, are unconvincing because they all use a problematic structure based on poorly measured and theoretically inappropriate pseudo-probabilities that are designed to capture the key deterrence elements of a state’s death penalty regime, and because their instruments are of dubious validity. We also discuss the appropriateness of the implicit assumption of the 2SLS studies that OLS estimates of the impact of the death penalty would be biased against a finding of deterrence.

    Uses and Abuses of Empirical Evidence in the Death Penalty Debate

    with John J. Donohue

    Stanford Law Review (2005) 58:791-846.

    Also reprinted in Economics of Criminal Law, Steven Levitt and Thomas Miles (eds), 2008, Elgar Publishing.

    Does the death penalty save lives? A surge of recent interest in this question has yielded a series of papers that purport to show robust and precise estimates of a substantial deterrent effect of capital punishment. We assess the various approaches that have been used in this literature, testing the robustness of these inferences. Specifically, we start by assessing the time series evidence, comparing the history of executions and homicides in the United States and Canada, and within the United States, between executing and non-executing states. We analyze the effects of the judicial experiments provided by the 1972 Furman and 1976 Gregg decisions and assess the relationship between execution and homicide rates in state panel data since 1934. We then revisit the existing instrumental variables approaches and assess two recent state-specific execution moratoria. In each case, we find that previous inferences of large deterrent effects based upon specific samples, functional forms, control variables, comparison groups, or IV strategies are extremely fragile and that even small changes in specifications yield dramatically different results. The fundamental difficulty facing the econometrician is that the death penalty - at least as it has been implemented in the United States - is applied so rarely that the number of homicides that it can plausibly have caused or deterred cannot be reliably disentangled from the large year-to-year changes in the homicide rate caused by other factors. As such, short samples and particular specifications may yield large but spurious correlations. We conclude that existing estimates appear to reflect a small and unrepresentative sample of the estimates that arise from alternative approaches. Sampling from the broader universe of plausible approaches suggests not just reasonable doubt about whether there is any deterrent effect of the death penalty, but profound uncertainty - even about its sign.

    Link to Donohue and Wolfers dataset (and other death penalty data).

    An executive summary; Paul Rubin's response; Our our rejoinder, followed by his rejoinder.


    Racial Discrimination Among NBA Referees

    with Joe Price

    Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(4):1859-1887.

    The NBA provides an intriguing place to test for taste-based discrimination: referees and players are involved in repeated interactions in a high-pressure setting with referees making the type of split-second decisions that might allow implicit racial biases to become evident. Moreover, the referees receive constant monitoring, and feedback on their performance. (Commissioner Stern has claimed that NBA referees "are the most ranked, rated, reviewed, statistically analyzed and mentored group of employees of any company in any place in the world.") The essentially arbitrary assignment of refereeing crews to basketball games, and the number of repeated interactions allow us to convincingly test for own-race preferences. We find that - even conditioning on player and referee fixed effects (and specific game fixed effects) - that more personal fouls are awarded against players when they are officiated by an opposite-race officiating crew than when officiated by an own-race refeeing crew. These biases are sufficiently large that we find appreciable differences in whether predominantly black teams are more likely to win or lose, according to the racial composition of the refereeing crew.

    Executive summary

    On-line appendix

    Analysis of recent data

    Download data and Stata programs

    Awareness Reduces Racial Bias

    with Devin G. Pope and Joseph Price

    NBER Working Paper No. 19765

    Can raising awareness of racial bias subsequently reduce that bias? We address this question by exploiting the widespread media attention highlighting racial bias among professional basketball referees that occurred in May 2007 following the release of an academic study. Using new data, we confirm that racial bias persisted in the years after the study's original sample, but prior to the media coverage. Subsequent to the media coverage though, the bias completely disappeared. We examine potential mechanisms that may have produced this result and find that the most likely explanation is that upon becoming aware of their biases, individual referees changed their decision-making process. These results suggest that raising awareness of even subtle forms of bias can bring about meaningful change.

    Biased Referees?: Reconciling Results with the NBA's Analysis

    with Joe Price

    Contemporary Economic Policy, 30(3):320-328, July 2012

    In a recent study, we used National Basketball Association (NBA) box-score data a 13-year period including nearly 600,000 foul calls to show that NBA referees call relatively more fouls on players of another race. The NBA commissioned its own study using internal data with information on calls made by individual referees and claimed the results show there is no bias among the referees in the NBA. This paper is an attempt to reconcile these competing claims.

    Racial Bias in the NBA: Implications in Betting Markets

    with Tim Larsen and Joe Price

    Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 4(2), 2008.

    Recent studies have documented the existence of an own-race bias on the part of sports officials. In this paper we explore the implications of these biases on betting markets. We use data from the 1991/92-2004/05 NBA regular seasons to show that a betting strategy exploiting own-race biases by referees would systematically beat the spread.

    Diagnosing Discrimination: Stock Returns and CEO Gender

    Published, Journal of the European Economic Association, 4(2-3), May 2006.

    A vast labor literature has found evidence of a "glass ceiling", whereby women are under-represented among senior management. A key question remains the extent to which this reflects unobserved differences in productivity, preferences, prejudice, or systematically biased beliefs about the ability of female managers. Disentangling these theories would require data on productivity, on the preferences of those who interact with managers, and on perceptions of productivity. Financial markets provide continuous measures of the market's perception of the value of firms, taking account of the beliefs of market participants about the ability of the men and women in senior management. As such, financial data hold the promise of potentially providing insight into the presence of mistake-based discrimination. Specifically if female-headed firms were systematically under-estimated, this would suggest that female-headed firms would outperform expectations, yielding excess returns. Examining data on S&P 1500 firms over the period 1992-2004 I find no systematic differences in returns to holding stock in female-headed firms, although this result reflects the weak statistical power of our test, rather than a strong inference that financial markets either do or do not under-estimate female CEOs.

    Download dataset and Stata programs.

    Prediction Markets

    The Promise of Prediction Markets

    Arrow, Forsythe, Gorham, Hahn, Hanson, Ledyard, Levmore, Litan, Milgrom, Nelson, Neumann, Ottaviani, Schelling, Shiller, Smith, Snowberg, Sunstein, Tetlock, Tetlock, Varian, Wolfers and Zitzewitz

    Science, 320, p.877, May 16 2008.

    Reviews the extant literature on prediction markets, and how they can be harnessed for use in both public policy and business settings. We assess current legal impediments to the adoption of prediction markets, and describe how CFTC regulation may create a more useful regulatory environment.

    How Prediction Markets Can Save Event Studies

    with Erik Snowberg and Eric Zitzewitz

    in Prediction Markets, Leighton Vaughn Williams (ed.), Routledge, 2011

    This review paper articulates the relationship between prediction market data and event studies, with a special focus on applications in political economy. Event studies have been used to address a variety of political economy questions|from the economic effects of party control of government to the importance of complex rules in congressional committees. However, the results of event studies are notoriously sensitive to both choices made by researchers and external events. Specifically, event studies will generally produce different results depending on three interrelated things: which event window is chosen, the prior probability assigned to an event at the beginning of the event window, and the presence or absence of other events during the event window. In this paper we show how each of these may bias the results of event studies, and how prediction markets can mitigate these biases.

    Point Shaving: Corruption in NCAA Basketball

    American Economic Review 96(2), May 2006.

    Point-spread betting on NCAA basketball yields incentives for players and gamblers that are both asymmetric and highly non-linear, thereby encouraging mutually beneficial effort manipulation through "point shaving". This paper assesses game outcomes and point spreads from over 40,000 games between 1989 and the present, finding that there exists a "prima facie" case that point shaving is surprisingly widespread.

    Prediction Markets in Theory and Practice

    with Eric Zitzewitz

    The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd ed. Larry Blume and Steve Durlauf (eds.)

    Prediction Markets, sometimes referred to as "information markets," "idea futures" or "event futures", are markets where participants trade contracts whose payoffs are tied to a future event, thereby yielding prices that can be interpreted as market-aggregated forecasts. This article summarizes the recent literature on prediction markets, highlighting both theoretical contributions that emphasize the possibility that these markets efficiently aggregate disperse information, and the lessons from empirical applications which show that market-generated forecasts typically outperform most moderately sophisticated benchmarks. Along the way, we highlight areas ripe for future research.

    Video of a talk given to the New Horizons in Science Briefing.

    A review of the field of prediction markets on "This week in Science" (mp3 file)

    Explaining the Favorite-Longshot Bias: Is it Risk-Love, or Misperceptions?

    with Erik Snowberg

    Journal of Political Economy, August 2010, 118(4) 723-746.

    The favorite-longshot bias presents a challenge for theories of decision making under uncertainty: This longstanding empirical regularity is that betting odds provide biased estimates of the probability of a horse winning, and longshots are overbet, while favorites are underbet. Neoclassical explanations have rationalized this puzzle by appealing to rational gamblers who overbet longshots due to risk-love, or alternatively information asymmetries. The competing behavioral explanations emphasize the role of misperceptions of probabilities. We provide a novel empirical test that can differentiate these competing theories, focusing on the pricing of compound or "exotic" bets. We test whether the model that best explains gamblers' choices in one part of their choice set (betting to win) can also rationalize decisions over a wider choice set, including betting in the win, exacta, quinella or trifecta pools. We have a new large-scale dataset ideally suited to test these predictions and find evidence in favor of the view that misperceptions of probability drive the favorite-longshot bias, as suggested by Prospect Theory. Along the way we provide more robust evidence on the favorite-longshot bias, falsifying the conventional wisdom that the bias is large enough to yield profit opportunities (it isn't) and that it becomes more severe in the last race (it doesn't).

    Interpreting Prediction Market Prices as Probabilities

    with Eric Zitzewitz

    Revise and resubmit, Review of Economics and Statistics

    NBER Working Paper #12200

    While most empirical analysis of prediction markets treats prices of binary options as predictions of the probability of future events, Manski (2004) has recently argued that there is little existing theory supporting this practice. We provide relevant analytic foundations, describing sufficient conditions under which prediction markets prices correspond with mean beliefs. Beyond these specific sufficient conditions, we show that for a broad class of models prediction market prices are usually close to the mean beliefs of traders. The key parameters driving trading behavior in prediction markets are the degree of risk aversion and the distribution on beliefs, and we provide some novel data on the distribution of beliefs in a couple of interesting contexts. We find that prediction markets prices typically provide useful (albeit sometimes biased) estimates of average beliefs about the probability an event occurs.

    Five Open Questions About Prediction Markets

    with Eric Zitzewitz

    Information Markets: A New Way of Making Decisions in the Public and Private Sectors, AEI-Brookings Press, eds: Robert Hahn and Paul Tetlock.

    Interest in prediction markets has increased in the last decade, driven in part by the hope that these markets will prove to be valuable tools in forecasting, decision-making and risk management - in both the public and private sectors. This paper outlines five open questions in the literature, and we argue that resolving these questions is crucial to determining whether current optimism about prediction markets will be realized.

    Download a copy of the whole book.

    Prediction Markets

    with Eric Zitzewitz

    Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(2), Spring 2004.

    We analyze the extent to which simple markets can be used to aggregate disperse information into efficient forecasts of unknown future events. Drawing together data from a range of prediction contexts, we show that market-generated forecasts are typically fairly accurate, and they outperform most moderately sophisticated benchmarks. Carefully designed contracts can yield insight into the market's expectations about not only probabilities, means and medians, and also uncertainty about these parameters. Moreover, conditional markets can effectively reveal the market's beliefs about regression coefficients, although we still have the usual problem of disentangling correlation from causation. We discuss a number of market design issues and highlight domains in which prediction markets are most likely to be useful.

    Prediction Markets: Does Money Matter?

    with Emile Servan-Schreiber, David Pennock and Brian Galebach

    Electronic Markets, 14(3), September 2004.

    The accuracy of prediction markets has been documented for both markets based on real-money and those based on play-money. To test how much extra accuracy can be obtained by using real money versus play-money, we set up a real-world on-line experiment pitting the predictions of (real-money) against those of (play-money) regarding American Football outcomes during the fall/winter 2003 NFL season. As expected, both types of markets exhibited significant prediction powers, and remarkable performance compared to individual humans. But, perhaps surprisingly, the play-money markets did not perform any worse than the real-money markets. We speculate that this result reflects two opposing forces: real-money markets may better motivate information discovery while play-money market may yield more efficient information aggregation.

    Australia: Mostly Economics, Some Politics

    Happiness and the Human Development Index: Australia is Not a Paradox

    with Andrew Leigh

    Australian Economic Review, June 2006.

    In "Happiness and the Human Development Index: The Paradox of Australia," Blanchflower and Oswald (2005) observe an apparent puzzle: they claim that Australia ranks highly in the Human Development Index (HDI), but relatively poorly in happiness. However, when we compare their happiness data with the HDI, Australia appears happier, not sadder, than its HDI score would predict. This conclusion also holds when we turn to a larger cross-national dataset than the one used by Blanchflower and Oswald, when we analyse life satisfaction in place of happiness, and when we measure development using GDP per capita in place of the HDI. Indeed, in the World Values Survey, only one other country (Iceland) has a significantly higher level of both life satisfaction and happiness than Australia. Our findings accord with numerous cross-national surveys conducted since the 1940s, which have consistently found that Australians report high levels of wellbeing.

    This paper was written in response to Blanchflower and Oswald's original paper, and here's Blanchflower and Oswald's rejoinder

    NBER Working Paper version includes a useful data appendix listing all cross-national happiness datasets which include Australia

    Download dataset and Stata programs

    Competing Approaches to Forecasting Elections: Economic Models, Opinion Polling and Prediction Markets

    with Andrew Leigh

    Economic Record 82(258), September 2006.

    We review the efficacy of three approaches to forecasting elections: econometric models that project outcomes on the basis of the state of the economy; public opinion polls; and election betting (prediction markets). We assess the efficacy of each in light of the 2004 Australian election. This election is particularly interesting both because of innovations in each forecasting technology, and also because the increased majority achieved by the Coalition surprised most pundits. While the evidence for economic voting has historically been weak for Australia, the 2004 election suggests an increasingly important role for these models. The performance of polls was quite uneven, and predictions both across pollsters, and through time, vary too much to be particularly useful. Betting markets provide an interesting contrast, and a slew of data from various betting agencies suggests a more reasonable degree of volatility, and useful forecasting performance both throughout the election cycle and across individual electorates.

    NBER Working Paper version includes useful data appendices

    Three Tools for Forecasting Federal Elections: Lessons from 2001

    with Andrew Leigh

    Australian Journal of Political Science July 2002 (Lead article)

    How best to predict Australian federal election results? We analyze three forecasting tools – opinion polls, economic models, and betting odds. Historically, we find that opinion polls taken close to the election are quite accurate, while economic models provide better medium-run forecasts. The 2001 election largely follows this pattern, although the economic models provided more accurate projections than recorded through the 1990s. Against these, we compare betting odds, analyzing a rich data source from one of Australia’s largest bookmakers, Centrebet. The betting market not only correctly forecast the election outcome, but also provided very precise estimates of outcomes in a host of individual electorates. Betting fluctuations provide an intriguing quantitative record of the shifting fortunes of the campaign. We conclude that – particularly in marginal seats – the press may have better served its readers by reporting betting odds than by conducting polls.

    Published Discussions

    Comment on Jeremy Greenwood and Nezih Guner's "Marriage and Divorce Since World War II: Analyzing the Role of Technological Progress on the Formation of Households"

    NBER Macroeconomics Annual, April 4, 2008.

    Slides from my discussion

    Conference Discussions

    In Appreciation of Olivier Blanchard

    “New Directions in Research and Policy”

    Prepared for Olivier Blanchard Retirement Celebration, MIT, June 4, 2016.

    Comments on Gathergood, Guttman-Kenney and Hunt

    “How do Payday Loans Affect Consumer Finances?”

    NBER Summer Institute, Law and Economics, Cambridge, July 23, 2015.

    Comments on Friedman, Baker, Mellers, Tetlock and Zeckhauser

    “The Value of Precision in Geopolitical Forecasting”

    NBER Summer Institute, Economics of National Security, Cambridge, July 20, 2015.

    Twitter for Economists

    A talk on how and why economists should use Twitter

    American Economics Association Annual Meeting, Boston, January 3, 2015.

    Comments on Piketty

    "Capital in the Twenty-First Century"

    by Thomas Piketty

    Prepared for CBO Adviser's Meeting, Washington DC, June 13, 2014.

    Comments on Gordon and Dahl

    "Views among Economists: Professional Consensus or Point-Counterpoint?"

    by Roger Gordon and Gordon Dahl

    American Economics Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, January 5, 2013.

    Comments on Sapienza and Zingales

    "Economic Experts vs. Average Americans"

    by Paola Sapienza and Luigi Zingales

    American Economics Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, January 5, 2013.

    Comments on Schwartz-Ziv

    "Does the Gender of Directors Matter?"

    by Miriam Schwartz-Ziv

    American Economics Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, January 4, 2013.

    Comments on Matsa and Miller

    "A Female Style in Corporate Leadership? Evidence from Quotas"

    by David Matsa and Amalia Miller

    NBER Law and Economics Summer Institute, Cambridge, July 28, 2011.

    Comments on Berber and Blattman

    "The Industrial Organization of Rebellion: The Logic of Forced Labor and Child Soldiering"

    by Bernd Beber and Chris Blattman

    American Economics Association Annual Meeting, Atlanta, January 3, 2009.

    Comments on Dai, Jin, and Zhang

    "Litigation Risk and Executive Compensation"

    by Zhonglan Dai, Li Jin, and Wijing Zhang

    NBER Law and Economics Summer Institute, Cambridge, July 22, 2009.

    Comments on Mian, Sufi, and Trebbi

    "The Political Economy of the U.S. Mortgage Default Crisis"

    by Atif Mian, Amir Suffi, and Francesco Trebbi

    NBER Monetary Economics Spring Meeting, New York, March 20, 2009.

    Discussion of Prescott and Laber

    "The Effects of Judge, Prosecutor, and Defendant Race and Gender Interactions on Defendant Outcomes"

    by JJ Prescott and Eric Laber

    American Economics Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, January 3, 2008.

    Comments on Coibion and Gorodnichenko

    "What can survey forcasts tell us about informational rigidities?"

    by Olivier Coibion & Yuriy Gorodnichenko

    NBER Monetary Economics Fall Meeting, Cambridge, November 13, 2008.

    Comments on Dezbakhsh and Rubin

    "From the 'Econometrics of Capital Punishment' to the 'Capital Punishment' of Econometrics"

    by Hashem Dezbakhsh and Paul Rubin

    Conference on Empirical Legal Studies, Cornell, September 12, 2008

    Comments on Blomberg and Engel

    "Lines in the Sand: Economic Integration and Disintegration of Post-War Iraq"

    by Brock Blomberg and Rozlyn Engel

    NBER Economics of National Security Summer Institute, Cambridge, July 25, 2008.

    Comments on Gonzalez and Ozcan

    by Libertad Gonzalez and Berkay Ozcan

    IFN Conference on Family, Children and Work, Stockholm, May 22, 2008

    Comments on Gil and Levitt

    "Testing the Efficiency of Markets in the 2002 World Cup"

    by Ricard Gil and Steven Levitt

    American Economic Association Meetings, New Orleans, January 4, 2008.

    Comments on Blinder and Morgan

    "Do Monetary Policy Committees Need Leaders? A Report on an Experiment"

    by Alan Blinder and John Morgan

    American Economic Association Meetings, New Orleans, January 4, 2008.

    Comments on Broz, Frieden and Weymouth

    "Exchange-Rate Policy Attitudes: Direct Evidence from Survey Data"

    by J. Lawrence Broz, Jeffry Frieden and Stephen Weymouth

    IMF Annual Research Conference, Washington DC, November 15, 2007

    Comments on Abrams

    "Do Judges Vary in their Treatment of Race?"

    by David Abrams, Marianne Bertrand and Sendhil Mullainathan

    Conference on Empirical Legal Studies, New York, November 9, 2007.

    Comments on Olken and Barron

    "The Simple Economics of Extortion: Evidence from Trucking in Aceh"

    by Ben Olken and Patrick Barron

    NBER Economics of Crime Working Group, Cambridge, September 14, 2007.

    Comments on Fischman

    "Decision-Making Under a Norm of Consensus: A Structural Analysis of Three-Judge Panels"

    by Joshua Fischman

    NBER Summer Institute - Law and Economics, Cambridge, July 31, 2007.

    Comments on DellaVigna and La Ferrara

    "Detecting Illegal Arms Trade"

    by Stefano DellaVigna and Eliana La Ferrara

    NBER Summer Institute - Political Economy, Cambridge, July 17, 2007.

    Comments on Prediction Market Accuracy

    Comments cover three papers:
    1. "Bookmaker and Pari-Mutuel Betting: Is a (Reverse) Favourite-Longshot Bias Built-in?", by Alexander Koch and Hui-Fai Shing
    2. "Public Signal Bias and Prediction Market Accuracy", by Tom Gruca and Joyce Berg
    3. "Ignorance Prior Bias in Prediction Markets", by Lionel Page

    Workshop on The Growth of Gambling and Prediction Markets: Economic and Financial Implications, U.C. Riverside, May 21, 2007.

    Comments on Gender Discrimination

    Comments cover two papers:
    1. "Do Women in Top Corporate Management and Governance Help Women to Advance?", by Lois Joy and Sarah Lang
    2. "Women in Science - Fulfillment or Frustration?", by Sara Connolly and Susan Long

    Society of Labor Economists Annual Meetings, Chicago, May 4, 2007.

    Comments on Durlauf, Navarro and Rivers

    "Notes on the Econometric Analysis of Crime"

    by Steven Durlauf, Salvador Navarro and David Rivers

    Workshop on Understanding Crime Trends, Committee on Law and Justice, National Academies of Science and Engineering, Washington D.C., April 24, 2007.

    Comments on Rothstein and Yoon

    "Mismatch in Law School" and "Affirmative Action in Law School Admissions: What Do Racial Preferences Do?"

    by Jesse Rothstein and Albert Yoon

    NBER Law and Economics Spring Meeting, Cambridge, March 1, 2007.

    Comments on Foster, Haltiwanger and Krizan

    "The Evolution of National Retail Chains: How We Got Here"

    by Lucia Foster, John Haltiwanger, and CJ Krizan

    American Economic Association Annual Meetings, Chicago, January 7, 2007.

    Comments on Akabayashi

    "Who Suffered from Superstition in the Marriage Market: The Case of Hinoeuma in Japan"

    by Hideo Akabayashi

    American Economic Association Annual Meetings, Chicago, January 7, 2007.

    Comments on Faggio, Salvanes and Van Reenen

    "Understanding the Evolution of Wage and Productivity Dispersion: Cross Country Evidence"

    by Giulia Faggio, Kjell Salvanes and John Van Reenen

    "em>Global Network on Inequality Conference on "New Directions in Inequality and Stratification", Princeton, April 8, 2006.

    Comments on Aguiar and Hurst

    "Measuring Trends in Leisure: The Allocation of Time over Five Decades"

    by Mark Aguiar and Erik Hurst

    San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank Conference on "Labor Markets and the Macroeconomy", San Francisco, March 3, 2006.

    Comments on Fisman, Iyengar, Kamenica and Simonson

    "Dating Markets - Theory and Experimental Evidence"

    by Ray Fisman, Sheena Iyengar, Emir Kamenica and Itamar Simonson

    American Economic Association Annual Meetings, Boston, January 6, 2006.

    Comments on Clark and Etile

    "Values, Votes and Slopes - Political Behavior and the Marginal Utility of Income"

    by Andrew Clark and Fabrice Etile

    American Economic Association Annual Meetings, Boston, January 6, 2006.

    Comments on Barth, Li, McCarthy, Phumiwasana and Yago

    "Economic Impacts of Global Terrorism: From Munich to Bali"

    by James Barth, Tong Li, Don McCarthy, Triphon Phumiwasana and Glenn Yago

    American Economic Association Annual Meetings, Boston, January 8, 2006.

    Comments on "Careers and Advancements within Firms"

    Comments cover 3 papers:
    1. "Promotions, State Dependence and Intrafirm Job Mobility: Insiders vs. New Hires", by Pablo Acosta
    2. "Three Forms of Inequality: Advantage, the Absence of Advantage, and Disadvantage", by Nancy DiTomaso, Corinne Post, Randall Smith, George Farris, Rene Cordero
    3. "Career System Practices: An Examination of Factors Affecting the Development of Managerial Capital", by Schalon Harrison Newton.

    Wharton Careers and Career Transitions: New Evidence for a New Economy, Philadelphia, June 24, 2005.

    Comments on "Retirement Modeling"

    Comments cover 5 papers:
    1. "Estimating early retirement with private alternatives", by Matias Eklof and Daniel Hallberg
    2. "Welfare Effects of Social Security Reforms Across Europe: the case of France and Italy", by Raquel Fonseca and Thepthida Sopraseuth
    3. "A Qualitative Investigation of the Laffer Curve on the Continued Work Tax: The French Case", by Francois Langot, Jean-Olivier Hairault, and Thepthida Sopraseuth
    4. "Labor Force Participation Dynamics and Social Security Claiming Decisions", by Pierre-Carl Michaud
    5. "Back to Work: Expectations and Realizations of Work after Retirement", by Nicole Maestas

    EALE/SOLE Joint Annual Meetings, June 4, 2005.

    Comments on Grant and Koeniger

    "Redistributive Taxation and Bankruptcy in US States"

    by Charles Grant and Winfried Koeniger

    IZA Workshop on Labor Market Institutions, December 3, 2004.

    Comments on Aakvik, Salvanes and Vaage

    "Measuring Heterogeneity in the Returns to Education in Norway Using Educational Reforms"

    by Arild Aakvik, Kjell Salvanes and Kjell Vaage

    ZEW Evaluation Conference, Mannheim Germany, October 22, 2004

    Comments on Bertrand, Kramarz, Schoar and Thesmar

    "Politically-Connected CEOs and Corporate Outcomes: Evidence from France"

    by Marianne Bertrand, Francis Kramarz, Antoinette Schoar and David Thesmar

    European Summer Symposium in Labour Economics, September 18, 2004

    Comments on Prat and Stromberg

    "State Television and Voter Information"

    by Andrea Prat and David Stromberg

    Stanford Conference on the Media and Economic Performance, March 6, 2004.

    Comments on Gibbs, Ierulli and Meyersson Milgrom

    "Careers in Firm & Occupational Labor Markets"

    by Michael Gibbs, Kathryn Ierulli and Eva Meyersson Milgrom

    Society of Labor Economists Annual Meetings, September 27, 2003.

    The Business of Sports: An Introduction to Sports Economics

    Introductory remarks for a panel discussion

    Panel included Bill Walsh, Mike Sullivan, Jim Plunkett, Rick Barry, Jamie Baker, Dennis Gilbert and Larry Baer.

    Presentation to the Young President's Organization, San Jose Sharks Stadium, February 6, 2003.

    Comments on Kubik and Moran

    "Lethal Elections: Gubernatorial Politics and the Timing of Elections"

    by Jeffrey Kubik and John Moran

    Econometric Society (ASSA) Annual Meetings, Washington DC, January 5, 2003.

    Comments on Dieppe, Henry and McAdam

    "Labour Market Dynamics in the Euro Area: A Model-Based Sensitivity Analysis"

    by Alistair Dieppe, Jerome Henry and Peter McAdam

    Monetary Policy and the Labor Market in the US, the Euro-area and Japan. A Conference in Honor of James Tobin. New York, November 22, 2002.

    Comments on "Correlates and Consequences of Domestic Violence for Low-Income Women"

    Comments cover three papers:
    1. "Child Support Enforcement and Domestic Violence among Non-Cohabiting Couples", by Angela Fertig, Sara McLanahan and Irv Garfinkel
    2. "Domestic Violence Over Time: What Does It Mean For Child And Adolescent Functioning In Low-Income Families?", by Brenda Lohman, Elizabeth Votruba-Drzal and Lindsay Chase-Lansdale
    3. "Does Employment Protect Women From Domestic Violence?", by Christina Gibson, Katherine Magnuson, Lisa Gennetian and Greg Duncan

    APPAM annual conference, Dallas, November 7, 2002.

    Comment on Ziedonis

    "When the Giants' Shoulders are Crowded: Fragmented Rights and Patent Strategies in Semiconductors"

    by Rosemarie Ziedonis

    Business Environment Conference, Stanford GSB, March 22, 2002.

    Comments on Edlund and Pande

    "Why Have Women Become Left-wing: The Political Gender Gap and the Decline in Marriage"

    by Lena Edlund and Rohini Pande

    Wallis Conference on Political Economy, Rochester, September 29, 2001