Institutional Affiliation: Lancaster University
Information about this author at RePEc
NBER Working Papers and Publications
|June 2014||Guns and Votes|
with Laurent Bouton, Paola Conconi, Francisco Pino: w20253
Why are U.S. congressmen reluctant to support gun control regulations, despite the fact that most Americans are in favor of them? We argue that re-election motives can lead politicians to take a pro-gun stance against the interests of an apathetic majority of the electorate, but in line with the interests of an intense minority. We develop a model of gun control choices in which incumbent politicians are both office and policy motivated, and voters differ in the direction and intensity of their preferences. We derive conditions under which politicians support gun control early in their terms, but oppose them when they approach re-election. We test the predictions of the model by analyzing votes on gun-related legislation in the U.S. Senate, in which one third of the members are up for re-e...
|April 2004||Political Pressure Deflection|
with James E. Anderson: w10439
Much economic policy is deliberately shifted away from direct political processes to administrative processes --- political pressure deflection. Pressure deflection poses a puzzle to standard political economy models which suggest that having policies to `sell' is valuable to politicians. The puzzle is solved here by showing that incumbents will favor pressure deflection since it can deter viability of a challenger, essentially like entry deterrence. U.S. trade policy since 1934 provides a prime example, especially antidumping law and its evolution.
Published: James Anderson & Maurizio Zanardi, 2009.
"Political pressure deflection,"
Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 129-150, October.
citation courtesy of