2100 Hillside Road
Storrs, CT 06269
Institutional Affiliation: University of Connecticut
NBER Working Papers and Publications
|October 2019||Does Costly Reversibility Matter for U.S. Public Firms?|
with Erica X.N. Li, Chen Xue, Lu Zhang: w26372
Yes, most likely. The firm-level evidence on costly reversibility is even stronger than the prior evidence at the plant level. The firm-level investment rate distribution is highly skewed to the right, with a small fraction of negative investments, 5.79%, a tiny fraction of inactive investments, 1.46%, and a large fraction of positive investments, 92.75%. When estimated via simulated method of moments, the standard investment model explains the average value premium, while simultaneously matching the key properties of the investment rate distribution, including the cross-sectional volatility, skewness, and the fraction of negative investments. The combined effect of costly reversibility and operating leverage is the key driving force behind the model’s quantitative performance.