The Internationalization of Science
& Engineering:
Issues of Work, Education, and
Security
The Science & Engineering Workforce
Project
of the National Bureau of Economic
Research
Sponsored by the Sloan
Foundation
Conference of 15-16 May
2003
The Earth Institute, Columbia
University, New York, NY
Table
of Contents
I. Economic, Political, and
Demographic Contexts
1. Kofi
Annan, A Challenge to the Worlds Scientists, Science, vol. 299, 7
March 2003
[page 7] http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/reprint/299/5612/1485.pdf
2. Pete Engardio, Aaron Bernstein, and Manjeet Kripalani, Is Your Job Next? A new round of globalization is sending upscale jobs offshore. They include chip design, engineering, basic research...., BusinessWeek, 3 February 2003 [page 8]
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/03_05/b3818001.htm
3. Hiawatha
Bray, Passage to
JP Morgan Chase
& Co. plans to outsource some of its stock market research to Bombay this
summer, signaling possible new arenas for the trend that already has sent tens
of thousands of information technology jobs abroad in recent years.
A surge in
overseas hiring could result in major job losses inside the US financial
services sector. Business consulting firm A.T. Kearney Inc. last week released
a survey of 100 major American banks, brokerage houses, and insurance
companies, projecting half a million financial services jobs will be shifted
overseas in the next five years, equal to 8 percent of total employment in the
sector.
The practice of
outsourcing may be catching on among financial services and business consulting
firms for the same reasons that computer software companies such as Microsoft
Corp. and IBM Corp. are increasing their use of overseas labor. Countries like
India offer sharply lower labor costs, while supplying workers with excellent
technical and financial know-how. For instance, in 2001, MBA graduates from the
prestigious Indian Institutes of Technology could expect to earn just $12,000,
compared to an average starting salary of $102,338 for graduates of Harvard
Business School.
New York-based JP
Morgan said last week that the analyst research reports it prepares for stock
investors will soon be prepared in part by Indian business school graduates
working in Bombay. Meanwhile, A.T. Kearney said it is already having much of
its research done by Indian workers.
''We're talking
about very highly educated people with advanced degrees, who are very
motivated,'' said A.T. Kearney managing director Andrea Bierce.
For decades,
financial services companies like Citigroup and GE Capital have shifted some of
their business activities overseas. But traditionally this has involved
relatively low-level work, such as typing huge volumes of data into computers
or handling simple bookkeeping activities. That trend has accelerated in the
past five years as companies have sought to lower their costs to remain
competitive.
But the move
toward sending financial research abroad comes at a sensitive time for Wall
Street. Last week, 10 top investment banks firms reached a $1.4 billion
settlement with regulators aimed at protecting investors from biased research.
It was unclear whether the settlement would speed the outsourcing of analyst
work overseas.
''With the market
for financial institutions not turning around, and not seeing the revenues that
they'd hoped, financial institutions have had to continue to look for ways to
reduce costs,'' said Bierce.
Indeed, beginning
about a year ago, A.T. Kearney moved much of its own research to India. ''One
[reason] was as a way to reduce our overall costs,'' said Bierce. ''But two, we
could take advantage of the time change.'' Bierce said that she can e-mail a
data request to an Indian colleague who's at work while she's at home. The next
morning, the information is waiting in her e-mail box.
Another research
firm, Deloitte Consulting, said the financial outsourcing boom isn't limited to
the United States. Last month, Deloitte analyst Christopher Gentle predicted
that financial firms in the major industrialized nations would move 2 million
jobs to low-wage countries over the next five years, with about half the jobs
going to India. Gentle estimated that the shift could save the world's 100
largest firms $138 billion a year by 2008.
JP Morgan Chase
spokesman Brian Marchiony said his company isn't laying off American analysts
in order to hire Indian MBAs. Instead, the Indian workers will do the
heavy-duty number crunching, freeing up the Americans to focus on higher-level
financial analysis, and letting them spend more time with customers. ''We will
not only increase productivity for senior analysts inside the US, but lower
costs for the overall department,'' Marchiony said.
It's unclear
whether investors would be comfortable with financial advice based on offshore
analysis. Stock analysts are presently laboring under a cloud of scandal.
Charges that high-profile analysts gave investors inaccurate information to
help their firms chase investment banking business led to last week's
settlement between regulators and securities firms.
But SEC spokesman
John Heine said that having part of the analysis done overseas shouldn't matter
to investors, because it doesn't matter to regulators. ''If the research is
being put out as a product by the investment bank, the investment bank is
responsible for it,'' Heine said. ''It doesn't matter where the people putting
it out work.''For now, other major financial firms don't seem in a hurry to
follow JP Morgan Chase's lead. Representatives of Boston-based Fidelity
Investments and Putnam Investments said that the firms have long had analysts
based outside the United States, but not for purposes of reducing labor costs.
Both firms say they have no plans to shift analyst work to India or other
low-wage centers. Similar responses came from Merrill Lynch & Co., Solomon
Smith Barney and Goldman Sachs.
4. Susan F. Martin, Heavy Traffic: International Migration in an Era of Globalization, Brookings Review, Fall 2001 [page 18]
http://www.brook.edu/press/REVIEW/fall2001/martin.htm
5. Jagdish Bhagwati, Borders Beyond Control, Foreign Affairs, vol. 82, no. 1, January/February 2003 [page 22]
http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20030101faessay10225/jagdish-bhagwati/borders-beyond-control.html
6. Susan
Martin and B. Lindsay Lowell, U.S. Immigration Policy, High Skilled Workers
and the New Global Economy,
working paper of 2001
[page 29]
7. Opening
the door: Whom to let in to the richer countries and why, The Economist,
http://www.economist.com/surveys/displayStory.cfm?Story_id=1416410
8. A survey of migration, The Economist, 2 November 2002 [page 40]
http://www.economist.com/surveys/displayStory.cfm?Story_id=1416410
9. David
Wessel, Immigrations Attraction Lies in Its Boost to Economic Vitality, Wall
Street Journal, 27 February 2003
[page 54]
10. Joel Kotkin,
Immigrants Cushion the Economic Fall, Wall Street Journal, 17 January
2002 [page 55]
11. Erik Eckholm
and Joseph Kahn, Asia Worries about Growth of Chinas Economic Power,
New York Times, 24 November 2002 [page
56]
12. Michael S. Teitelbaum, The U.S. Science and Engineering Workforce: An Unconventional Portrait, prepared for GUIRR Summit, 12 November 2002 [page 58]
http://www.phds.org/reading/guirr2002/teitelbaum.php
II. Internationalization of
Education
1. Katalin
Szelenyi, Explaining the Migration and Settlement of Foreign Graduate
Students: Global Integration Theory and the Theory of Cumulative Causation,
working paper of 2002 for the UCLA Center for Comparative & Global Research
[page 63]
http://www.international.ucla.edu/CMS/files/katipaper.doc
2. Michael G. Finn, Stay Rates of Foreign Doctorate Recipients from U.S. Universities, 1999, December 2001 [page 72]
http://www.orau.gov/orise/pubs/stayrate01.pdf
3. Yugui
Guo, Graduate Education Reforms and International Mobility of Scientists and
Engineers in China from National
Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Studies, Graduate Education
Reform in Europe, Asia, and the Americas and International Mobility of
Scientists and Engineers: Proceedings of an NSF Workshop, NSF 00-318,
Project Officer, Jean M. Johnson (Arlington, VA: NSF, 2000) [page
91]
http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/nsf00318/c1s1.htm
4. Atul
Wad, Issues in Human Resources in Science and Engineering: India from Graduate
Education Reform in Europe, Asia, and the Americas and International Mobility
of Scientists and Engineers: Proceedings of an NSF Workshop, NSF
00-318, Project Officer, Jean M. Johnson (Arlington, VA: NSF, 2000) [page
99]
http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/nsf00318/c1s3.htm
5. Yugui
Guo, Graduate Education Reforms and International Mobility of Scientists and
Engineers in Taiwan from National
Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Studies, Graduate Education
Reform in Europe, Asia, and the Americas and International Mobility of
Scientists and Engineers: Proceedings of an NSF Workshop, NSF 00-318,
Project Officer, Jean M. Johnson (Arlington, VA: NSF, 2000) [page
103]
http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/nsf00318/c1s5.htm
6. Education,
still in demand: Arabs dont like American policy but do like its education, The
Economist, October 26, 2002
[page 110]
http://www.economist.com/research/articlesBySubject/displayStory.cfm?story_id=1408054&subject=Egypt
7. Simon
London, The networked world changes everything: The Silicon Valley visionary
[Greg Papadopoulos] says the internet will continue to bring rapid and
fundamental changes in centres of research and learning, Financial Times,
24 March 2003
[page 112]
III. The H-1B Visa Debate, and
Immigrant Science Workers in the
1. Margaret
L. Usdansky and Thomas J. Espenshade, The H-1B Visa Debate in Historical
Perspective: The Evolution of U.S. Policy Toward Foreign-Born Workers, Center
for Comparative Immigration Studies, University of California-San Diego,
Working Paper No. 11, May 2000 [page
113]
http://www.ccis-ucsd.org/PUBLICATIONS/wrkg11.PDF
2. Rafael
Alarcon, Migrants of the Information Age: Indian and Mexican Engineers and
Regional Development in Silicon Valley, Center for Comparative Immigration
Studies, University of California-San Diego, Working Paper No. 16, May 2000 [page
126]
3. Rafiq
Dossani, Chinese and Indian Networks in Silicon Valley, a summary of a
May-June 2001 survey of over 10,000 members of Silicon Valley engineering
associations (2272 responses) [page
145]
http://www.sipa.org/resources/Data_Summary_v5_0801.pdf
4. Stuart
Anderson, Foreign-Born Engineers and Scientists Dont Undercut Wages: They
Earn More, commentary for the Cato Institute (www.cato.org), 25 October 1996 [page
149] http://www.cato.org/dailys/10-25-96.html
5. Cindy
Rodriguez, Battle brewing over tech visas: Critics say scarce jobs should go
to Americans, Boston Globe, 9 July 2002 [page
150]
6. Rashmee
Z. Ahmed, Britain closes door on Indian IT professionals, Sunday Times of
India (Mumbai), 1 September 2002 [page
151]
7. Professional
Contractors Group (U.K.), Review of Work Permit Policy on Recruitment and
Employment Agencies and Contractors (a report compiled by Philip Ross, Stephen
Hunter, and Gurdial Rai), June 2002 [page
152]
http://www.pcg.org.uk/resources/pcg-review7.pdf
IV. The Brain Drain Thesis
Revisited
1. Outward
bound: Do developing countries gain or lose when their brightest talents go
abroad?, The Economist (Special report),
http://www.people.hbs.edu/mdesai/outbound.html
2. Jeffrey Mervis, Science Indicators: NSF Report Paints a Global Picture, Science, vol. 296, 3 May 2002 [page 171]
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/reprint/296/5569/829.pdf
3. Jean
M. Johnson and Mark C. Regets, International Mobility of Scientists and
Engineers in the
http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/issuebrf/sib98316.htm
4. William J.
Carrington and Enrica Detragiache, How Extensive is the Brain Drain?, Finance
& Development, June 1999 [page
175]
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/1999/06/carringt.htm
5. Mario
Cervantes and Dominique Guellec, The brain drain: Old myths, new realities,
Observer, no. 230, January 2002 [page
179]
6. Hyaeweol
Choi, Reverse Brain Drain: Who Gains or Loses?, International Higher Education,
Winter 2000 [page 182]
http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/soe/cihe/newsletter/News02/text3.html
7. Sharon
G. Levin and Paula E. Stephan, Are the Foreign Born a Source of Strength for
U.S. Science?, Sciences Compass,
http://www.bmbf.de/pub/talent_ii-3.pdf
8. David
Cyranoski, Plugging the brain drain: China produces fine scientists, but too
many go abroad for training and do not return, Nature, vol. 417, 13
June 2002 [page 190]
9. David
Cyranoski, Independent biology institute targets Chinas exiles, Nature,
21 November 2002 [page 191]
10. Zhang
Guochu and Li Wenjun, International Mobility of Chinas Resources in Science
and Technology and its Impact from International Mobility of the Highly Skilled
(Paris: OECD, 2001)
[page 192]
http://www.oecd.org/pdf/M00023000/M00023517.pdf
11. Timothy
Roberts, Asian techies and entrepreneurs pursue new opportunities far from
Silicon Valley, Silicon Valley/San Jose Business Journal, 7 April 2003 [page
198]
http://sanjose.bizjournals.com/sanjose/stories/2003/04/07/focus1.html
12. Reversing
the brain drain, The Hindu [online edition of the national newspaper/
India], 20 June 2001 [page
200]
http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/2001/06/20/stories/14202185.htm
13. Brain drain
costs Asia billions, BBC News online, 10 July 2001 [page
201]
http://www.undp.org/hdr2001/clips/BBCbrain.pdf
14. Brain
drain costs developing countries billions from CNN.com, 10 July 2001 [page
203]
http://www.undp.org/hdr2001/pr5.pdf
15. Vajpayee
calls for reversing brain drain, cutting red tape, Business Line [The
Hindu financial daily], 4 January 2003 [page
204]
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/bline/2003/01/04/stories/2003010402410500.htm
16. Katalin
Szelenyi, The Politics of Highly Skilled Migration: Policies in Whose
Interest?, working paper of 2002 for the
http://www.international.ucla.edu/CMS/files/katipaper2.doc
17. B.
Lindsay Lowell and Allan M. Findlay, Migration of Highly Skilled Persons from
Developing Countries: Impact and Policy Responses Synthesis Report, report
prepared for the International Labour Office, Geneva, October 2001 [page
213]
http://www.ilo.org/public/english/protection/migrant/download/skmig-sr.pdf
18. Investing
in People, Sharing Skills, and Knowledge, chapter three of Eliminating World
Poverty: Making Globalisation Work for the Poor White Paper on International
Development (Cm. 5006, Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of
State for International Development by Command of Her Majesty, December 2000) [page
217]
http://www.globalisation.gov.uk/Chapter3/BridgingTheDigitalDivide.html
19. Uwe
Hunger, The Brain Gain Hypothesis: Third World Elites in Industrialized
Countries and Socioeconomic Development in their Home Country, from Center for
Comparative Immigration Studies, University of California-San Diego, Working
Paper No. 47, January 2002 [page
232]
http://www.ccis-ucsd.org/PUBLICATIONS/wrkg47.PDF
20. Silicon
Valley Immigrants Forging Local and Transnational Networks, Research Brief:
Public Policy Institute of California, issue #58, April 2002 [page
255]
http://www.ppic.org/main/publication.asp?i=219
21. Mihir
A. Desai, Devesh Kapur, and John McHale, The Fiscal Impact of High Skilled
Emigration: Flows of Indians to the U.S., working paper of November 2002 [page
257]
http://www.people.hbs.edu/mdesai/fiscalimpact.pdf
22. James
P. Trevelyan and Sabbia Till, Observations from a Study of Professional
Engineering in Australia and Pakistan, working paper of May 2003 [page
283]
V. Development Economics with Jeffrey
Sachs, The Earth Institute, Columbia University; Science and the Role of
Government/ Harold Varmus, President and CEO, Memorial Sloan-Kettering
Cancer Center
1. Jeffrey
Sachs, The Global Innovation Divide from Adam B. Jaffe, Josh Lerner, and
Scott Stern, Innovation Policy and the Economy (vol. 3) (Cambridge: MIT
Press, 2003)
[page 297]
2. Jeffrey
Sachs, Getting through the bottleneck, Our Planet: The Magazine of the UNEP,
vol. 13, no. 4, 2003 [page
308]
http://www.ourplanet.com/txtversn/134/sachs.html
3. Jeffrey Sachs,
Weapons of mass salvation, The Economist, 26 October 2002 [page
311]
http://www.globalpolicy.org/socecon/develop/2002/1024weapons.htm
4. Jeffrey D. Sachs, A New Global Effort to Control Malaria, Science, vol. 298, 4 October 2002 [page 313]
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/reprint/298/5591/122.pdf
5. Harold Varmus, Squeeze on Science, Washington Post, 4 October 2000 [page 316]
http://www.aps.org/apsnews/1200/120011.html
6. Harold Varmus,
Harvard University Commencement address, 6 June 1996 [page
317]
http://www.nih.gov/about/director/060696.htm
7. Harold Varmus,
Lasker Awards Luncheon address, 21 September 2001 [page
321]
VI. Case Studies and Background from
1. Zeng
Guoping and Li Zhengfeng, Research and Development in
http://hcs.harvard.edu/~hapr/fall02_science/
2. Shing-Tung
Yau, Science and Technology in
http://web.mit.edu/lipoff/www/hapr/fall02_science/science.pdf
3. David
Cyranoski, Chinese plan pins big hopes on small science, Nature, vol.
414, 15 November 2001 [page
333]
4. Jia
Hepeng, China plans $600 million boost for high-tech projects from SciDev.Net
(11 January 2002) [page 334]
5. K.S.
Jayaraman, Indian science gets major budget boost and T.V. Jayan, Indian
science research: in the doldrums? from SciDev.Net (7 March 2002 and 30
December 2002) [page 335]
6. K.S.
Jayaraman, Indias scientists agonize over fall in publication rate, Nature,
vol. 419, 12 September 2002
[page 336]
7. K.S.
Jayaraman, Indian prime minister pledges to revamp science, Nature,
vol. 421, 9 January 2003 [page
337]
8. Ashok
Parthasarathi, A champion of new technologies: Despite its strengths, India
needs to invest far more to retain its lead, Nature, vol. 422, 6 March
2003 [page 338]
9. Amol
Sharma, Hard drives make inroads into rural India, Christian Science Monitor,
1 May 2003 [page 340]
10. Jacques Gaillard, Mohamad Hassan, and Roland Waast in collaboration with Daniel Schaffer, Africa for the UNESCO Science Report 2002 [page 341]
A new report on the current state of
science in Africa emphasises widely differing fortunes across the continent,
but also underlines the opportunities for future improvement - providing
governments listen to its message.
It's not unusual to hear scientists
complaining that they are underpaid. Nor is it unusual to hear that declining
government support for science in deference to market mechanisms has not been
met by increased funding for research from other sources, in particular the
private sector. But if such complaints are a familiar litany in Europe (and
even occasionally the United States), the problems encountered in such
countries pale in comparison to those currently being experienced in many parts
of Africa.
With aid policies towards the
continent now under the international spotlight, it is both useful and timely
to be made aware just how bad these latter problems can be. Figures just
released by the Paris-based Institut de Recherche pour la Développement (IRD)
do just that. Taken from a series of reports 'Science in Africa at the Dawn of
the 21st Century' commissioned by the French government and the European
Commission in Brussels, the picture they paint is grim (see 'Poor pay threatens
African science'). More positively, however, the reports also hint at a
possible way forward, one that uses the experience of other parts of the world
(particularly Europe) to develop a strategy appropriate to the massive
challenges that African science now faces.
Certainly it will take a large amount
of effort to eliminate the many bleak patches in the current panorama. For
example, a survey of science researchers in 15 African countries carried out
for the IRD reports found that in those working to Sub-Saharan Africa (apart
from South Africa), more then 90 per cent complained of being underpaid. Many
said they have to supplement their earning with part-time employment in other
sectors, such as working in farming or running small businesses, a commitment
which inevitably places severe limits on their scientific productivity.
Furthermore, as the report points
out, a significant reduction in government support for science in many African
countries over the past two decades the results of a variety of political and
economic pressures has left deep scars. This has been particularly true in
countries such as Nigeria which, as a result the lack of apparent interest of a
series of regimes in either higher education or long-term economic growth (an
approach now being reversed), has seen a 50 per cent decline its output of
scientific literature during the 1990s.
A chapter in the forthcoming Unesco
Science Report 2002, written partly by the two main authors of the IRD reports,
puts the situation succinctly. It points out that a number of recent surveys of
scientific publishing among African countries lead to the same conclusion: that
during the first half of the 1990s, a time when research budgets in the North
were climbing steadily, "Africa has lost 20 - 25 per cent of its relative
capacity to make contributions to world science" and that was already from a
low base.
But the picture in Africa is not all
gloomy. The IRD report points out, for example, that for all the country's
current economic uncertainty, science in South Africa continues to be
productive, even if (as in Egypt) at a static level. Indeed, in some countries
the progress has been impressive. This is particularly true of the countries
such as Morocco, Algeria and Tunisa that lie along Africa's Northern coast,
known collectively as The Maghreb, which saw an increase in scientific
production measured in terms of scientific publications of 60 per cent over
the 1990s.
What are the lessons that can be
learnt from this? As the authors of the IRD report indicate, one is the need
for a sustained political commitment on the part of governments to provide not
only adequate financial support for research laboratories, but also an active
encouragement for science as a tool of social policy, integrating it into
political and economic decision-making at all levels. It is this approach that
has been partly responsible for the success of the Maghreb, a success which now
needs to be repeated elsewhere.
Secondly, it seems clear that those
African countries whose science is prospering most are the ones that have been
able to adapt to what has been called the 'new mode of scientific production'.
This is an approach which recognised that the old distinctions between basic
and applied research are no longer valid, and that the key to a viable and
self-sustaining scientific community is to be able to link its projects and
goals to locally-determined priorities, but in a way that 'frames' research
programmes rather than rigidly dictates them.
The final lesson is that regional and
international cooperation can be highly beneficial, if not essential, and that
funding (including foreign assistance) can be most effective when it is not
fragmented, but supports integrated regional efforts. The IRD report points to
the way in which the European Commission's Framework programme has successfully
achieved such collaboration, helping to boost scientific publications by almost
50 per cent over a period in which African publications have only grown by 6.5
per cent. Perhaps it is time for Africa to take a leaf out of Europe's book.
11. Lee
Branstetter and Yoshiaki Nakamura, Is Japans Innovative Capacity in
Decline?, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 9438, January
2003 [page 362]
http://papers.nber.org/papers/W9438
12. Arthur
Kornberg, Whither Biotechnology in Japan? Why
biotechnology hasnt yet taken off, Harvard Asia Pacific Review, vol.
6, no. 2, Fall 2002
[page 384]
http://web.mit.edu/lipoff/www/hapr/fall02_science/biotech.pdf
13. Raymond
Feddema, South Korea plans its biotechnology future, Biotechnology and
Development Monitor, no. 50, March 2003 [page
388]
14.
Michael Bond, Where progress is a lost cause, New Scientist, 26 April 2003
[page 394]
http://www.newscientist.com/inprint/previous/20030426.jsp
15. Ehsan
Masood, Blooms in the desert: The Arab world has a proud history of
scholarship, but in recent decades it has neglected science, Nature,
vol. 416, 14 March 2002 [page
395]
16. Servio P.
Ribeiro, et. al., Brazil has the talent: just let us get on with the job,
letter to
Nature, vol. 413, 6 September 2001 [page
398]
17. Hebe
Vessuri, Mobility Programs for Scientists and Engineers in Latin America from
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Studies, Graduate
Education Reform in Europe, Asia, and the Americas and International Mobility
of Scientists and Engineers: Proceedings of an NSF Workshop, NSF
00-318, Project Officer, Jean M. Johnson (Arlington, VA: NSF, 2000) [page
399]
http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/nsf00318/c3s5.htm
18. Valeria
Roman, Argentina drops scheme for young researchers and Argentinas
scientists want more expatriate support from SciDev.Net (9
March 2002 and 15 January 2003) [page
402]
19. Hector
Ciapuscio, What does the future hold for Argentine science? and Esther
Orozco, The self-help challenges for Mexican science from SciDev.Net (13
January 2002 and 22 April 2002) [page
403]
20. Jose
Goldemberg, What is the Role of Science in Developing Countries from Science
magazine online [page 404]
http://ctcs.fsf.ub.es/prometheus21/articulos/obsprometheus/goldemberg1140.pdf
VII. Security Issues and Post-9/11
Fallouts
1. John
H. Marburger, Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy, statement
before the Committee on Science, U.S. House of Representatives, 10 October 2002 [page
407]
2. David
Malakoff, Security and Science: Researchers See Progress in Finding the Right
Balance, Science, vol. 298, 18 October 2002 [page
412] http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/reprint/298/5593/529.pdf
3. Marjorie
Valbrun, U.S. Web System Unveiled to Track Foreign Students, Wall Street
Journal, 13 May 2002 [page
413]
4. Ronald
M. Atlas, National Security and the Biological Research Community, Science,
vol. 298, 25 October 2002 [page
414] http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/reprint/298/5594/753.pdf
5. Geoff
Brumfield, Researchers rage at tightened restrictions on U.S. immigration, Nature,
vol. 422, 4 April 2003 [page
416]
6.
Scientists criticise research restrictions, BBC News online, 18 February 2002 [page
418]
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/1827017.stm
7. Martin Enserink, USDA Closes Lab Doors to Foreign Scientists, Science, vol. 296, 10 May 2002 [page 420]
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/reprint/296/5570/996.pdf
8. Richard Stone, U.S. Visa Crackdown Disrupts Meetings, Science, vol. 297, 23 August 2002 [page 421]
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/reprint/297/5585/1259.pdf
9. Visa
restrictions hamper research, San Jose Mercury online, posted at
www.bayarea.com, 10 March 2003 [page
422]
http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/news/opinion/5357048.htm
10. Chronicle
of Higher Education, special supplements on homeland security and U.S.
universities, 11 April 2003
[page 423]
11. Amitai
Etzioni, Patriot Act is needed, but so are revisions, Christian Science
Monitor, 2 May 2003 [page
444]
12. Mark
Clayton, Higher Espionage: The CIA finds a warmer welcome on campus since
9/11...., Christian Science Monitor, 29 April 2003 [page
445]
13. Alice
P. Gast, The Impact of Restricting information Access on Science and
Technology, statement and policy recommendations of 2003
[page 448]
http://www.aau.edu/research/Gast.pdf
14. Charles
M. Vest, Response and Responsibility: Balancing Security and Openness in
Research and Education, statement of September 2002 for the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology Report of the President for the Academic Year 2001-2002 [page
455]
http://web.mit.edu/president/communications/rpt01-02.html
15. Haim
Baruh, Terrorism Hysteria Blocks Foreign Students Entry, letter to the Wall
Street Journal, 28 January 2003 [page
463]
16. Scott Atran,
Who Wants to be a Martyr?, New York Times,
17. David
S. Cloud and Jacob M. Schlesinger, U.S. Pursues Leads Recovered in Capture of
al Qaeda Official, Wall Street Journal, 4 March 2003 [page
466]
18. Kelly
Greene and Chad Terhune, Before al Qaeda, Studies in the U.S., Wall Street
Journal, 4 March 2003 [page
467]
19. R.
Adam Moody, Reexamining Brain Drain from the former Soviet Union, The
Nonproliferation Review, Spring-Summer 1996
[page 468]
http://cns.miis.edu/pubs/npr/vol03/33/moody33.pdf
20. Paula
E. Stephan, Grant C. Black, James D. Adams, and Sharon G. Levin, Survey of
Foreign Recipients of U.S. Ph.D.s, Science, vol. 295, 22 March 2002 [page
474] http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/295/5563/2211a
21. Ann
Davis, Plan to Fingerprint Visitors to U.S. Raises Many Doubts, Wall Street
Journal, 31 July 2002 [page
477]
22. Betty
Liu, War turns employers against foreign workers, Financial Times, 12
December 2001 [page 478]
23. Norihiko
Shirouzu, Signs of an Ethnic Backlash Put Arab Americans on Defensive, Wall
Street Journal, 14 September 2001
[page 479]
24. Michael
Barbaro, Biodefense Plan Greeted with Caution: Drug Firms Want Better
Guarantees, Washington Post, 2 May 2003
[page 480]
25. Cory
F. Coll, Why Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore Require Foreign National
Participation in their Research and Development Programs, paper of March
2003 [page 482]
|