Resources for the Future
1616 P Street, NW
Washington, DC 20036
Institutional Affiliation: Resources for the Future
Information about this author at RePEc
NBER Working Papers and Publications
|May 2020||Co-Benefits and Regulatory Impact Analysis: Theory and Evidence from Federal Air Quality Regulations|
with Joseph E. Aldy, Matthew Kotchen, Mary F. Evans, Meredith Fowlie, Arik Levinson
in Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, volume 2, Matthew Kotchen, James H. Stock, and Catherine Wolfram, editors
|October 2011||Cost-Effectiveness of Electricity Energy Efficiency Programs|
with Toshi H. Arimura, Shanjun Li, Richard G. Newell: w17556
We analyze the cost-effectiveness of electric utility ratepayer-funded programs to promote demand-side management (DSM) and energy efficiency (EE) investments. We specify a model that relates electricity demand to previous EE DSM spending, energy prices, income, weather, and other demand factors. In contrast to previous studies, we allow EE DSM spending to have a potential long-term demand effect and explicitly address possible endogeneity in spending. We find that current period EE DSM expenditures reduce electricity demand and that this effect persists for a number of years. Our findings suggest that ratepayer funded DSM expenditures between 1992 and 2006 produced a central estimate of 0.9 percent savings in electricity consumption over that time period and a 1.8 percent savings over all...
Published: Toshi H. Arimura, Shanjun Li, Richard G. Newell, and Karen Palmer, 2012. "Cost-Effectiveness of Electricity Energy Efficiency Programs," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2). citation courtesy of
|June 2009||Energy Efficiency Economics and Policy|
with Kenneth Gillingham, Richard G. Newell: w15031
Energy efficiency and conservation are considered key means for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and achieving other energy policy goals, but associated market behavior and policy responses have engendered debates in the economic literature. We review economic concepts underlying consumer decision making in energy efficiency and conservation and examine related empirical literature. In particular, we provide an economic perspective on the range of market barriers, market failures, and behavioral failures that have been cited in the energy efficiency context. We assess the extent to which these conditions provide a motivation for policy intervention in energy-using product markets, including an examination of the evidence on policy effectiveness and cost. Although theory and empirical evid...
Published: Kenneth Gillingham & Richard G. Newell & Karen Palmer, 2009. "Energy Efficiency Economics and Policy," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 1(1), pages 597-620, 09. citation courtesy of
|April 1996||Environmental Regulation and Innovation: A Panel Data Study|
with Adam B. Jaffe: w5545
In a 1991 essay in Scientific American, Michael Porter suggested that environmental regulation may have a positive effect on the performance of domestic firms relative to their foreign competitors, by stimulating domestic innovation. We examine the stylized facts regarding environmental expenditures and innovation in a panel of manufacturing industries. We find that lagged environmental compliance expenditures have significant positive effect on R&D expenditures when we control for unobserved industry-specific effects. We find little evidence, however, that industries' inventive output (as measured by patent applications) is related to compliance costs).
Published: Review of Economics and Statistics (1997): 610-619. citation courtesy of