Daniel A. Schmierer
Department of Economics
University of Chicago
1126 E. 59th Street
Chicago IL 60637
Institutional Affiliation: University of Chicago
NBER Working Papers and Publications
|September 2010||Tests of Hypotheses Arising in the Correlated Random Coefficient Model|
with James J. Heckman: w16421
This paper examines the correlated random coefficient model. It extends the analysis of Swamy (1971, 1974), who pioneered the uncorrelated random coefficient model in economics. We develop the properties of the correlated random coefficient model and derive a new representation of the variance of the instrumental variable estimator for that model. We develop tests of the validity of the correlated random coefficient model against the null hypothesis of the uncorrelated random coefficient model.
Published: Heckman, James J. & Schmierer, Daniel, 2010. "Tests of hypotheses arising in the correlated random coefficient model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 1355-1367, November. citation courtesy of
|October 2009||Testing the Correlated Random Coefficient Model|
with James J. Heckman, Sergio S. Urzua: w15463
The recent literature on instrumental variables (IV) features models in which agents sort into treatment status on the basis of gains from treatment as well as on baseline-pretreatment levels. Components of the gains known to the agents and acted on by them may not be known by the observing economist. Such models are called correlated random coefficient models. Sorting on unobserved components of gains complicates the interpretation of what IV estimates. This paper examines testable implications of the hypothesis that agents do not sort into treatment based on gains. In it, we develop new tests to gauge the empirical relevance of the correlated random coefficient model to examine whether the additional complications associated with it are required. We examine the power of the proposed test...
Published: Heckman, James J. & Schmierer, Daniel & Urzua, Sergio, 2010. "Testing the correlated random coefficient model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 158(2), pages 177-203, October. citation courtesy of